Sounds good, Bill, thanks for the feedback! Yes, please delete the one post.
Not sure if you deleted already, but maybe post a summary level post in place?
I think this is a fine convention if everyone is clear. AND I wonder about the value of more private spaces for connecting, slower incubation, side conversations to resolve issues, etc. There are some wicked questions about "how can we be totally open and transparent as a contribution to the world AND have more private places to work on stuff that may cause harm or risk to participants if fully exposed? " There are cultural and gender issues, to name just two, that may make a blanket assumption of all public, all the time, a barrier to participation. Thinking THROUGH the tradeoffs might be a useful exercise to examine some of the larger issues of diversity, inclusion and equity.
Really good point, Nancy!
Discourse allows for “private” categories, that aren’t viewable or findable by anyone except forum members who have been specifically invited, and I would suggest we take advantage of them for more private discussions.
We already have private categories for Free Jerry’s Brain and forum admins. It’s easy to create more.
Good. Then that should be part of the notice you pinned!! It was not obvious to me. But again, I’m paying such distant, little attention these days I probably missed!
It is not, your attention is fine.
I thought about adding it when I drafted the notice, but then I worried it might be more confusing than helpful.
I was hoping it would come up in discussion, and then we could talk through it with more context. And a good grounding post like yours!
Fully agree! I usually find it quite useful if there’s the option for public and non-public posting, so everybody can decide on an individual, per-case basis where their messages belong into best. If it’s either all non-public, the material is trapped/lost/unshareable/unfindable (consider StackOverflow vs. ExpertExchange), and if it’s all public some conversations might be discouraged from happening in such a space. With both, it becomes a matter of (granular?) federation, the general concept expanding beyond just public/non-public and might include per author, topic, circle, date, etc. etc., and importantly also across services/places/sites/platforms/clients.
what is the latest on this @peterkaminski?
@lovolution, I’ll go ahead and make the changes soon, probably within a few days.
as in, there’s consensus on making it open to the public?
The whole convo is here… There wasn’t any dissent, so I think we’re okay to proceed with the plan.
I think we should promote the idea of using private topics more, but that might be best folded into a larger effort to document and facilitate forum use.
I’ve made the changes, and the site is now publicly visible, except for user profile pages.
I did not submit the site for indexing by any search engines, figuring that might be a good separate mini-project.
Summary of old/new settings and tests:
old Login / login required = yes Users / hide user profiles from public = no new Login / login required = no Users / hide user profiles from public = yes disable bannerness https://forum.openglobalmind.com/t/making-ogm-forum-publicly-visible/389 = yes tests can non-authenticated visitors see posts? yes can non-authenticated visitors NOT see user profiles? yes * https://forum.openglobalmind.com/u
I decided to leave it as-is.
I noticed that via.hypothes.is isn’t working, at least not for me.
That leads to a blank white page in Firefox, albeit with the Hypothesis bar overlayed on top, and clickable.
@holtzermann17, is that something that used to work and now doesn’t, or it just never worked?
FWIW, I suspect Discourse and hypothes.is won’t play well with each other for a long time, and maybe never.
I have changed the title of this topic from “ANNOUNCE: Making OGM Forum Publicly Visible” to “OGM Forum Is Now Publicly Visible”, reflecting that it no longer needs to be an announcement, and expressing it now in present tense, because the change has already been made.
No problem… was playing around with prefixes as a way of laying down some informal guides to people browsing…
I see pro’s and con’s of doing that…
Didn’t work before but I thought that was b/c of the need to login. Now, it simply doesn’t work! I think your HYPOTHESIS is correct b/c it doesn’t work on this site either: